|
President Trump has launched a Super Intelligence Force, chaired by national intelligence director Jay Clayton.
It has 120 days to report on the risks of AI. Who decides what counts as a threat?
Today in the “Incredible AI” world:
- Trump Launches Super Intelligence Force
- OpenAI’s Altman Accepts Some AI Risks
- Google Stops Open Source Bug Reports
- Compare AI Models Side by Side for Free
- 5 Super-Useful AI Tools You Should Try
- Top AI-Generated Image of the Day
Read Time: 4 minutes
|
|
|
Trump Forms Super Intelligence Panel:
President Trump just announced a new Super Intelligence Force, chaired by national intelligence director Jay Clayton. It follows his executive order rebranding AI as super intelligence. The branding came first.
Things to Know:
- Who's Running It: Clayton chairs the force, effectively becoming Washington's artificial intelligence czar. Andrew Ferguson, Emil Michael, and Scott Kupor are vice chairs.
- The Deadline: The force reportedly receives 120 days to summarize AI's risks and opportunities. Four months to finish a civilization-sized homework assignment.
- The Priority: Clayton insists the single biggest risk is simply not being first. Meanwhile, the charter cautions against overregulation stifling innovation.
- The Backstory: Trump largely dismissed AI safety debates as hoaxes, then promised this force regardless. The executives' pledge misspelled the United States.
Washington now has an AI czar, a reporting deadline, and a conveniently rebranded vocabulary. Its charter frames falling behind as the bigger danger. Expect the final report to read like a starting gun.
|
|
|
Sam Altman Accepts Some Risks From AI:
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman defended accepting some AI harms in exchange for broader access and innovation. He contrasted that view with Anthropic's approach to safety and regulation. The gap is philosophical.
Things to Know:
- The Philosophy: Altman argues society should accept some harmful consequences in exchange for AI's benefits. Guaranteeing zero scams simply isn't worth that.
- The Quiet Shift: OpenAI agreed with Amodei's call to slow frontier models and endorsed stricter state legislation. Its lobbyists backed outside safety evaluators.
- The Red Line: Altman called one San Francisco lab controlling AI a completely unacceptable trade-off. He still rejects catastrophic risks like losing control.
- The Rebuttal: An Anthropic spokesperson said its proposals cover frontier models only. Amodei previously said they're designed to advantage smaller competitors.
The two biggest labs now agree on more regulation than either publicly admits. What remains is a philosophical split over access and acceptable mess. That particular argument won't be settled anytime soon.
|
|
|
Google Freezes Bug Bounty Over AI Spam:
Google has paused its Open Source Software Vulnerability Reward Program as of October 1. The company blamed a significant rise in automated submissions, overwhelmingly invalid. AI flooded the bug hunt.
Things to Know:
- The Problem: Google says the vast majority of automated vulnerability reports were not valid. Engineers and open source maintainers ended up overwhelmed.
- The Hallucinations: According to Tom's Hardware, many reports contained AI-generated hallucinations. Imagine debugging software that never actually had the bug.
- Called It: Security experts warned last year that AI-generated reports threatened bug bounty programs. That warning has now become Google's operational reality.
- What's Next: Google expects an update during the first quarter of 2027. Meanwhile, researchers can redirect efforts toward its alternative bounty programs.
Bug bounties assumed finding a real flaw took real effort, and AI removed that friction. Every program paying for reports now faces the same flood. Cheap submissions make genuine expertise harder to see.
|
|
|
How to Use Nine AI Models in One Single Tab:
If you use AI tools regularly, there is a good chance you are juggling multiple subscriptions across different tabs. ChatGPT for writing, Claude for editing, Perplexity for research, Gemini for long documents. It works, but it is expensive and a little chaotic. And you never really know which model would have given you the best answer.
​AI Fiesta puts ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, Perplexity, DeepSeek, and more into a single chat window for $12 a month, which is less than the cost of any one premium AI subscription on its own.
Here’s how to use it:
- Sign up and open the chat: Create your account and you land directly in the main chat interface. All available AI models are listed and ready to toggle on or off. No separate logins, no tab switching, no copying prompts across windows.
- Run your prompt across multiple models at once: Type your question once and AI Fiesta sends it to all the models you have selected simultaneously. The responses show up side by side so you can compare answers, pick the best one, or combine insights from multiple models without doing any of that manually.
- Use Super Fiesta for automatic model selection: If you do not want to think about which model to use for what, Super Fiesta handles that for you. It reads your prompt and automatically routes it to whichever model is best suited for that specific task, then keeps the conversation context consistent as you follow up.
- Set up Custom Projects with system instructions: If you have recurring work like content writing, code reviews, or research, create a project with a set of instructions you only write once. Every model in that project follows those rules for every chat, so you are not re-explaining your context every single time.
- Access the Prompt Book and community: Paid subscribers get access to AI Fiesta’s curated Prompt Book at promptbook.aifiesta.ai, which has ready-to-use prompts organized by industry and task. Quarterly webinars are also included depending on the plan.
If you are already paying $20 a month for one AI tool and regularly wish you had access to the others too, this covers all of them for less.
|
|
|
- daily poll and result - |
|
|
Today's Poll:
| Q) Will AI change how we value human labor? |
|
|
|
Vote and find out the result tomorrow.
Yesterday's Result:
Q) Should AI-generated synthetic personas be regulated?
- A) Yes, identity risks - 98% đź‘‘
- B) No, creative freedom - 2%
|
|
|
​Kome AI: Summarize YouTube videos, articles, and PDFs instantly with AI.
​AgentGPT: Deploy autonomous AI agents that complete multi-step goals in your browser.
​StoryboardHero: Automatically generate complete video storyboards with AI scripts and visuals.
​Podium AI: Automate customer messaging and lead conversion with AI-powered responses.
​Astria AI: Train custom AI image models for personalized avatars and brand visuals.
|
|
|
The Pyramids Witness a Cosmic Friendship:
Prompt:
​
"Vintage retro photograph with film grain, scratches, and a faded yellowish tone. In a sunny desert, a crouching grey alien with large black almond eyes gently pets a calm brown-grey tabby cat wearing a collar with a round metal tag. Two more grey aliens stand beside a domed metallic flying saucer, with two pyramids in the distance. Photorealistic, sharp focus, blurred background."
|
|
|